Head-to-Head Comparison
| Factor | Team | Individual |
|---|---|---|
| Participation Rate | 70-80% | 50-60% |
| Peer Motivation | Strong | Limited |
| Inclusivity | Better | Can discourage |
| Simplicity | More setup | Simpler |
| Recognition | Shared | Personal |
Best Practice: Hybrid Approach
Combine Both for Maximum Impact
- Primary: Team average determines overall standings
- Secondary: Recognize top individual performers
- Bonus: "Most Improved" awards for personal growth
- Participation badges for consistent trackers
FAQs
Are team step challenges better than individual step goals at work?
Generally yes. Team challenges see 15-20% higher participation because of social accountability. They're more inclusive—someone having a bad week still contributes. Individual challenges work better for very competitive cultures.
How do you form balanced teams?
Mix fitness levels, departments, and locations. Aim for 4-8 people per team. Use random assignment with manual swaps. Avoid letting people self-select into friend groups.
Should we use team totals or averages?
Always averages. A 10-person team will always beat a 5-person team on totals. Averages level the playing field.
Can we run both team and individual?
Yes! Use team average as primary metric, but also recognize top individuals. This gives competitive types their leaderboard while keeping team collaboration.